Cases 11 - 20 of 4,101
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIRLS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIRLS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DOES
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
CODY ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAY ROBERTS and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL EARL MURPHY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN SPRAYBERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNOR v. MITCHELL
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
TONY L CONNOR, MOSES ROBERSON, KELVIN KING and others
Defendant:
Commander LARRY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, Sergeant MOORE and Sergeant FELICIA MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
