Cases 21 - 30 of 4,101
ALLEN v. WHITAKER et al
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
AANDRE DAVID ALLEN
Defendant:
Deputy WHITAKER, Warden LARRY MITCHELL and Captan ROBERT TROMBLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICE v. BERRY et al
as 5:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
JIMMY MACK RICE
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY, MARTIN and PADRAZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
HERRON LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and COLUMBUS GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MOSES et al
as 4:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FORD
Defendant:
DEXTER MOSES, Lieutenant SPATES and Unit Manager STUBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. DICKSON COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
DICKSON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. LUPPE et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HEATHER LUPPE, CAPTAIN BRIAN CAVE, KATIE CAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRYAN LEWIS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL and C O BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
