Cases 1 - 10 of 121
NARCUSSE v. GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE et al
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marie Narcisse and MARIE M MARCISSE
Defendant:
GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE, Peter Wrobel, Shad Stormant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRIDGES v. EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRIDGES
Defendant:
EARLY COUNTY GEORGIA, JAMES KIMBLE, WILLIAM C PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HANSLEY v. C&F FINANCE COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DEMORRIO HANSLEY
Defendant:
C&F FINANCE COMPANY and FLOWERS HONDA DEALERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JACKSON v. SKAMARYCZ et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
KRISTI C JACKSON
Defendant:
JESSICA A SKAMARYCZ and STACY W ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. MOHR et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
SPRATT HOWARD
Defendant:
MONTY MOHR, WILLIAM C BUSHNELL, JOHN A PURSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Delfidio Perez
Defendant:
Freddie L Bryant, III, Tony B Herring, Jr., Kenneth L Weston, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDLEY v. FORT et al
as 5:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
KARL FORT, TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
