Cases 1 - 10 of 89
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MACKRELL et al v. BUTLER
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
HALEY MACKRELL and M T M
Defendant:
ANGELA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRANKLIN v. THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN K FRANKLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF WARNER ROBINS and SERGEANT TIMOTHY T PIPPIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MCARTHUR et al v CITY OF ADEL GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 7:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Guardian Dana McArthur, Davis McArthur and DANA MCARTHUR
Defendant:
City of Adel, Georgia, Cook County, GA, John Gary Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, SOUTHEASTERN STAGES INC, O'REILLY AUTO PARTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
