Cases 91 - 100 of 10,394
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. USA
as 5:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
REGINALD LOWE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WRIGHT v. HEREDITARY NATIVE AMERICAN SEMINOLE WAR CHIEFTAIN
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
NEGUERIAN SIMONE WRIGHT
Respondent:
HEREDITARY NATIVE AMERICAN SEMINOLE WAR CHIEFTAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
