Cases 11 - 20 of 130
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSAW v. LUMSDEN et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE K LUMSDEN, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, JUDGE EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALLEY v. MITCHELL et al
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
FERDINAND SALLEY
Defendant:
Commander LARRY MITCHELL, Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Sergeant IRELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. CHASTEEN et al
as 5:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, ROSA CHILDS, PATSY BRIDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. YANKENLLOW et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARRYL PERNELL BUTLER
Defendant:
ELLEN H YANKENLLOW, JUANITA YVETTE WILLIAMS THORPE, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. LANIER et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Respondent:
JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER, TRE MCLENDON, RUSSELL WENG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLENDON v. WARD
as 1:2021cv00140
Petitioner:
JUSTICE SHUNTE MCCLENDON
Respondent:
TIMOTHY C WARD and H DWIGHT HAMRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. GRACE et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
OFFICER MAYA GRACE, CITY OF ALBANY GEORGIA and OFFICER H PAIGE
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
WADE OWENS, LAUREN PARISH, Judge WADE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STARLING v. CHASON et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
ALFRED STARLING
Defendant:
JUDGE JONATHAN K CHASON and JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
