Cases 1 - 10 of 40
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. FORT et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Defendant:
KARL FORT, JAMES TAYLOR and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KILBY et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
TAYMAR FREDERICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD KILBY, WARDEN OF SECURITY MCCLUNG, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FORT
as 5:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
DERRICK A JOHNSON
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENNEY v. FORT
as 5:2021cv00462
Petitioner:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRITT v. FORT et al
as 5:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL BRITT
Defendant:
KARL FORT and TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. WHITE et al
as 5:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY CLAYTON ROSS
Defendant:
WARDEN J WHITE, DEPUTY WARDEN Carl Fort, DEPUTY WARDEN R ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
