Cases 1 - 10 of 36
ANDERSON et al v. EARNEST et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
KYRIMA ANDERSON and PATRICK A LONG II
Defendant:
JUDGE T. CRAIG EARNEST, ELEXUS SISSON, JUDGE JOSHUA SUGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COFIELD v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
RANDY EUGENE COFIELD
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG, SHAUN SOUTHERLAND, DENISE WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. LONG
as 5:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAKE v. LONG, et al
as 5:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
TED WILSON LEE DRAKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG, WHITE, MAJOR LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMEY v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
JASON M TOOMEY
Defendant:
GARY LONG, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, MICHAEL MCMUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON and JAHLAND BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL LONG, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVID HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. LONG et al
as 5:2020cv00459
Defendant:
MAJOR JEFF NIX, OFFICER MATHEW MUNGER, OFFICER BRICE and others
Plaintiff:
XAVIER MILLER SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLATER v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHANCE SLATER
Defendant:
Officer GOOSBY, Officer TAMMY LONG, JOHNY JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
