Cases 11 - 20 of 165
GOLDEN v. ABDIFATAH et al
as 5:2021cv00441
Plaintiff:
Bryant Golden
Defendant:
OSMAN ABDIFATAH, DART TRANSIT COMPANY and ABDIFATAH SHARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
FORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FORD
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR STEPHANIE BRYANT, INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER ELLISON and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MCCOVEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, AARON PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRANFORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
BILLY CRANFORD, III
Defendant:
ERIC BRYANT, DONALD K WILLIAMS and KYLE SELPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
JONARD ANTRON BRYANT
Defendant:
Officer WILLIAMS, Lt VIRGINIA WILLIAMS and Officer DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WINHEIM et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
TITUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
DAVID TITUS WINHEIM, LEWIS LAMB, ERIC BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v WARD et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, STAN SHEPHERD, SHAWN EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
