Cases 11 - 20 of 26
RIDLEY v. ESTATE OF WILLIAM DICKERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Defendant:
ESTATE OF WILLIAM DICKERSON, BILL DICKERSON, TOMMY DICKERSON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. ZIRKEL et al
as 7:2020cv00008
Defendant:
COII STEWART, COII SHARP, COII WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. AUTRY STATE PRISON
as 1:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
AUTRY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALI v. BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 7:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHAKUR ALI
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, HAROLD W CLARKE, RONALD MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. ADAMS
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant:
ROBERT ADAMS and ADAM JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. WILLIAMS
as 7:2017cv00115
Petitioner:
TAURUS DICKERSON
Respondent:
STANLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DICKERSON et al
as 4:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARL DICKERSON and CAROL JEAN MAYO THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
DICKERSON et al v. SUNTRUST BANKS INC et al
as 4:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
CARL DICKERSON , CAROL JEAN MAYO THOMAS , DIMA INC and others
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANKS INC , SUNTRUST BANK , Jack Lew and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
SUNTRUST BANK and SUNTRUST BANKS INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Jack Lew, Internal Revenue Service and Jodi L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DICKERSON v. ASTRUE
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
PARNEY D DICKERSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 3:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
