Cases 11 - 20 of 52
MARINE et al v. MURPHY OIL USA INC et al
as 7:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marine, Tina R. Marine, AARON THOMAS and others
Defendant:
Melissa Mark, MURPHY OIL USA, INC., MURPHY OIL USA INC also known as MURPHY USA INC doing business as MURPHY EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLS v. COLSON et al
as 1:2020cv00144
Defendant:
JAMES MURPHY, JIMMIE COLSON, WILLIE RELIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY AARON NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00035
Plaintiff:
OLIVER MICHAEL MURPHY
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2020cv00066
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE LASHONDA MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRIS v. BURKE et al
as 3:2019cv00110
Defendant:
DAVID PHILLIPS, TARA LATIMER MURPHY, ANTHONY CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DELANE HARRIS, JR and VICTOR DELONE HARRIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00205
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MURPHY v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
LISA MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN v. MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY INC
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BROWN
Defendant:
MURPHY AUTO GROUP OF ALBANY INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
