Cases 21 - 30 of 243
GOTEL v. CARTER
as 5:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
TORU TANAKA GOTEL
Defendant:
SHAWN CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUDD v. JONES et al
as 4:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
DAWUAN TERRELL MUDD and DIVINE SERENITY MOON
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, SGT JUAN USQUIANO, LT PERNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, CHARLES MIMS, CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC v. CARTER et al
as 7:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC and CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC
Defendant:
JOSHUA B CARTER and DEEP SOUTH VEGETABLES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2021cv00079
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
GERALD LAMAR CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WRIGHT v. LAW FIRM OF ROOSEVELT CARTER
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
LAW FIRM OF ROOSEVELT CARTER
Plaintiff:
RA'HEEM QUAID WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. LAIDLER et al
as 5:2021cv00087
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK CRYSTAL CARTER, CLERK JUANITA M LAIDLER and MACON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN et al v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00405
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, JOSEPH L POLITE, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI and others
Petitioner:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00406
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI, CAPTAIN THOMAS F SUMPTER and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
