Cases 21 - 30 of 32
MADDOX v. COLVIN
as 5:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
LAWANNA T MADDOX
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
JACKSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
DESI LEE HYMAN JACKSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TELFAIR STATE PRISON, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOX v. WASHINGTON
as 7:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
CRAIG MADDOX
Respondent:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MADDOX v. VARIETY STORES INC
as 5:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
RUBY ETHEL MADDOX
Defendant:
VARIETY STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maddox v. USA
as 5:2011cv90096
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Reginald Tyrone Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maddox v. Kent et al
as 5:2009cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maddox
Defendant:
Corporal Kent and Deputy McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00334
Plaintiff:
Carla S Maddox and Carla S Maddox
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wood, et al v. City of Macon, GA, et al
as 5:2000cv00515
Plaintiff:
John E. Wood , James J. Wood , Joe Allen and others
Defendant:
Macon, Georgia , C. Jack Ellis , Melvin Waldrop and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Steve Draper , Wayne Avery , Chris Bartlett and others
Consol_defendant:
Macon, Georgia , Melvin Waldrop , Ben Hubbard and others
Objector:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Shakerz LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Fantasy Inc and others
Defendant:
Shakerz LLC and Sheri M Maddox
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
