Cases 21 - 30 of 201
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DUDLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMARIE DUDLEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY PAULK, CAPTAIN JASON CLIFTON, MR MATTHEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
TRISTAN MATTHEW ANDERSON
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GLENN v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GLENN
Defendant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEGRIN v. EVANS et al
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
NURSE BETTY EVANS, DR JAMES GRAHAM, DR MICHEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAFFI v. GIDDIDID et al
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
CHARLESTON ALEXANDER SAFFI
Defendant:
LT GIDDIDID, OFFICER MATTHEW and OFFICER STEWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEBOE v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
MATTHEW ANDREW TEBOE
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
