Cases 31 - 40 of 580
JACKSON v. DOES
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JOHN DOES et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Deputy Sheriff VICTOR PURNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. INDIVIOR, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
JANICE JACKSON
Defendant:
INDIVIOR, INC., INDIVIOR PLC, INDIVIOR SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JACKSON v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN PECORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
RICKY JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN R SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DEPUTY WARDEN REGINALD CLARK
as 5:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN REGINALD CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
