Cases 31 - 40 of 61
GRAHAM v. UNKNOWN
as 7:2018cv00072
Petitioner:
RODERICK C GRAHAM
Respondent:
UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUSHIN v. JONES et al
as 5:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
JONES, COOK, WILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHIN v. POLK, et al
as 5:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
POLK, MCKINION and GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHIN v. ELLERBE et al
as 5:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARLE RUSHIN
Defendant:
KELLY LEE ELLERBE, HILTON HALL, PAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANTHAM v. COLLIER et al
as 5:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS GRANTHAM
Defendant:
ALBERT B COLLIER, MATTHEW O SIMMONS and TRACY GRAHAM LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STIPE et al v. SAGAN et al
as 3:2017mc00001
Movant:
JOHN MICHAEL STIPE
Plaintiff:
ABKCO MUSIC INC , COLGEMS-EMI MUSIC INC , EMI ALGEE MUSIC CORP and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAGAN , NORTON LLC and BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
SELL v. SANDIFER
as 5:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM SCOTT SELL
Defendant:
PERRY SANDIFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE and SANDRA G YARBROUGH JONES
Consol_defendant:
REAL ESTATE, CARLTON FARMS INC, TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
RAYFIELD SPENCER and REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 4:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE, GRAHAM COMPANY , MITCHELL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
