Cases 31 - 40 of 255
MCCURTY v. TROTMAN et al
as 5:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
LT TROTMAN, LT WALLER, LT BOOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER et al v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN L ALEXANDER and ROGER WALTER STEWART, JR
Defendant:
KILILO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ALEXANDER et al v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN L ALEXANDER and ROGER WALTER STEWART, JR
Defendant:
KILILO KIJAKAZI, JOE BIDEN, AMANDA STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HARGREAVES v. BERRY
as 5:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Respondent:
WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUMMINGS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY WALTER, DEPUTY ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF CONSELOR WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A COX
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEY v. FORT
as 5:2021cv00462
Petitioner:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Respondent:
WARDEN CARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN, REGINA WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2021cv00203
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
