Cases 31 - 40 of 26,411
TABB v. WASHINGTON
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY TABB
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA-RAMOS et al v. HAMILTON et al
as 7:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Garcia-Ramos and Pablo Castillo-Olguin
Defendant:
KENT HAMILTON, HAMILTON GROWERS INC, SOUTHERN VALLEY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN KELMON, WARDEN MACFALEN, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARROW
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORI BARROW
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
HUMANITARIAN v. BAUN et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
JULIA A BAUN, CANDICE L BROCE, MARGARET CHUPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
