Cases 41 - 50 of 590
POPE v CULLEN et al
as 5:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN, CAPTAIN WESTBROOK, LT RUNYON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
RICK ALLEN WEBB
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. MASON et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
JENNIFER MASON, DIXON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. SALES et al
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARION BERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEPPERS v. DOES
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PEPPERS
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. LINDQUIST et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JAMES
Defendant:
BEN LINDQUIST, SILVIS, AMBROSE, LINDQUIST, COCH P.C., THOMASVILLE BRANCSHARE D/B/A THOMASVILLE NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
