Cases 41 - 50 of 178
WILLIS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv00133
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CORNWELL MCREE et al v. LEATHERBROOK HOLSTEINS LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
J CRISP ENTERPRISES LLC, JENNY CRISP, MARK W ISRAEL and others
Defendant:
LEATHERBROOK HOLSTEINS LLC, LEATHERBROOK HOLSTEINS #3 LLC and ADAM L GRAFT
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
BAKER v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2019cv00108
Defendant:
John William Johnson, Jr. and BOBBY G PETERS
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEMORE v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00090
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, NATHAN NORTON, DAVID ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
ERIN SHEPHARD MCLEMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
COBB v. WARREN et al
as 1:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
KENNETH T COBB
Defendant:
WALTER BERRY, DARRYL A WARREN, CRYSTAL L SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KEMP et al
as 1:2019cv00072
Defendant:
W DANIEL EBERSOLE, JIMMONIQUE R S ROGERS, MICHAEL BERG and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DONELL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FLONAR et al
as 5:2019cv00157
Defendant:
OFFICER CYNTHIA FLONAR and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Plaintiff:
ROGER GIBSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BRANNER v. FAIRCLOTH et al
as 7:2019cv00027
Defendant:
JAMI L LEWIS, JOHN JARROD ROBERT, MELANIE B CROSS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE BRANNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW v. HODGE et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
OFFICER PARKER, UNIT MANAGER ROGER HODGE and LT JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
JAMES NEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
