Cases 51 - 60 of 304
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROUP V LLC v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY UNIFIED GOVERNMENT
as 3:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
GROUP V LLC
Defendant:
ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY UNIFIED GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. MCCAULEY et al
as 3:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T ROLLINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCCAULEY and CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DESEAN SMITH
Defendant:
TREVON WILLIAMS, Former Sheriff IRA EDWARDS, UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEST v. MARSDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
LONDON ROZIER BEST
Defendant:
ETHAN MARSDEN, ENRIQUE RIVERA, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FAIR v. LADD et al
as 5:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
BRETT LADD, PUBLIC DEFENDER RASHAWN CLARK and TERRI L LARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. STEPHENS et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARIO DESMOND WRIGHT
Defendant:
JUDGE LAWTON STEPHENS, SHERIFF IRA EDWARDS, JR, CORPORAL BONIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWNING v. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BROWNING, JR
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY and CORPORAL APPLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
