Cases 51 - 60 of 1,886
ADCOCK v. WARD HOME SERVICES
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
DYLAN ADCOCK
Defendant:
WARD HOME SERVICES doing business as ACE HANDYMAN SERVICES EAST METRO ATLANTA (543) and WILLIAM WARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BYNUM-WILLIAMS v. SCUDERI
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
SYBIL ANGELA BYNUM-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER RICHARD SCUDERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERSON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN T SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERIES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GRUBBS v. COCHRAN et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
KEITH GRUBBS
Defendant:
WILLIAM COCHRAN, COCHRAN COACHWORKS, WILLIAM J COCHRAN and others
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, Warden R SHROPSHIRE, C MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR and LISA TAYLOR
Defendant:
GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC, GRP MADISON LLC, VEOLIA ENERGY OPERATING SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
