Cases 61 - 70 of 196
MULLINS v. COMBELLE et al
as 7:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
CARL J MULLINS
Defendant:
HOWARD COMBELLE, CONSTANT YOUNG, CAPTAIN CLIFTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and ROBERT BAYSE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS, DIRECTOR JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. COWENS et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
SHELTON R THOMAS
Defendant:
DOCTOR KENNETH COWENS, NURSE DEBORAH TYMES, LT PATRICIA THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. GARY et al
as 5:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN GARY, NURSE BETTY, OFFICER TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. MINTON et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON, CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE and ALCOVY JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLESTON v. GARY
as 5:2021cv00450
Petitioner:
RODRIGUEZ CHARLESTON
Respondent:
CAPTAIN JOHN GARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUBBARD v. LEE et al
as 5:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
AMOS HUBBARD
Defendant:
MAJOR A C LEE, CAPTAIN OBERSE, SERGEANT JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STEPHENS et al
as 5:2021cv00396
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER STEPHENS, WARDEN IVY, DEXTER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINSEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
JAMELLE W KINSEY
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK and Captain JASON CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. MOORE et al
as 7:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAMONT COCHRAN
Defendant:
Detective MOORE, JEFF BRINSON, Captain JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
