Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00340
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RANDLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 5:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAWAYNE RANDLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, STATE OF GEORGIA, OREGON, STATE OF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANAEME v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PHARMACY et al
as 5:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, GEORGIA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANAEME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARGROVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION
as 5:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. State of Georgia Secretary of State et al
as 5:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
State of Georgia Secretary of State and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arnold v. Bowles et al
as 5:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Arnold
Defendant:
Theodore Archie Bowles, Houston County Medical Center, Georgia Composite State Board of Medical Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
