Cases 81 - 90 of 131
WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
as 3:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MORRIS et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MORRIS and LABREKA MORRIS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PONDER v. ISHMAN et al
as 4:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
LEONARD PONDER
Defendant:
WENDY ISHMAN and Paul Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. MORALES et al
as 1:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
ISAAC MORRIS
Defendant:
JOSE MORALES, MARTY ALLEN, CEDRIC TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARINGTON v. Wilcox State Prison et al
as 5:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
MORRIS JEROME CLARINGTON
Defendant:
Wilcox State Prison and JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. PINE TIMBER WOOD PRODUCTION INC et al
as 5:2012cv00419
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
PINE TIMBER WOOD PRODUCTION INC, DENNIS L CAREY and JOHN E MORRIS, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HOLMES v. DALRYMPLE et al
as 5:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
MORRIS SCOTT HOLMES
Defendant:
DALRYMPLE, CALEB AJIBADE and JOSE MORALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGETT v. LEE et al
as 4:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
KEITH HARGETT
Defendant:
LEE, SHANE MORRIS, SUZAN WOODER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. BARFIELD et al
as 4:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
CAREY L BARFIELD , TARA BARFIELD , Hugh Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
