Cases 1 - 10 of 82
TAYLOR v. BARNES
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
LT BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BARNES et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BARNES and BLAKE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAVOR v. HOLT et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
KIDRON ISRAEL FLAVOR
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONNIE HOLT, SHERIFF MARKLEY, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARNES v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
WILLILAM A BARNES
Defendant:
MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF, WILLIAM LESLIE, TENESIA LESLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE GIFT BARN BOUTIQUE LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE GIFT BARN BOUTIQUE LLC, HOME PRO ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION INC, SHANE PARSONS doing business as SOUTH GEORGIA HEATING AND COOLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BARNES v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
DONALD GENE BARNES
Respondent:
UNNAMED WARDEN and WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. COWENS et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
SHELTON R THOMAS
Defendant:
DOCTOR KENNETH COWENS, NURSE DEBORAH TYMES, LT PATRICIA THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LASTER et al v. BARNES et al
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
LINDA LASTER and JUSTIN LASTER
Defendant:
RUSS F BARNES, GERALD E MOORE, JOHN M DUFFOO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
