Cases 1 - 10 of 147
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JEFFERSON v. KENDALL
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Garrett Jefferson
Defendant:
HONORABLE FRANK KENDALL, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE and Honorable FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WHITE v. BERNARD
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
WILLARD FRANK WHITE
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TACCHIO v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
FRANK TACCHIO
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. TOMLINSON et al
as 7:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LAKEITH JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAYTON TOMLINSON, GWEN ROBERTSON, SHERIFF DOUG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. REINHARDT et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DENUTA BROWN and ANTONIO DEUNTA BROWN
Defendant:
Judge BILL REINHARDT, SANDRA GUEST, ANDREW DOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
