Cases 1 - 10 of 204
NEWTON v. MOORE et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARQUIES NEWTON
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE, SGT KELLY and OFFICER CHILDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MOORE et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE and MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE, et al v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE, MASON DEAN and RONALD GLEEN RICE
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, Sergeant MOORE and Sergeant FELICIA MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FRAZIER et al
as 7:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MOORE
Defendant:
VELMA LAFAYE FRAZIER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MOORE v.JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. POLITE et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A WHEELER
Defendant:
JOSEPH POLITE, BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. MOORE
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Sergeant MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
