Cases 1 - 10 of 99
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN KELMON, WARDEN MACFALEN, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JACQUELINE BUNN, DAVID HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
RAYMON H STONE and RAYMON H STONE, JR
Defendant:
JANICE JORDAN, GREGORY SAMPSON, PASHION CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ALVIN STANLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. POLITE et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A WHEELER
Defendant:
JOSEPH POLITE, BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. POLITE et al
as 5:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A WHEELER
Defendant:
JOSEPH POLITE, BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
