Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 7:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMISON v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 5:2019cv00457
Plaintiff:
TEO A JAMISON
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, STATE OF GEORGIA, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
JAI DEVON LEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and BILLY HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ISAACS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 7:2013cv00127
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ISAACS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Derrick B Jackson
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Van Peavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
