Cases 1 - 10 of 192
HUMANITARIAN v. BAUN et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
JULIA A BAUN, CANDICE L BROCE, MARGARET CHUPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LATIMORE v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
AYAD S LATIMORE
Defendant:
MIKAL JONES, ASHLEY N CUELLAR, DAVID HARDGRAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
MALIK N MARTIN
Defendant:
MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, TAMARTHA LAMBERT, BRANDI MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KERCH v. MIMS et al
as 5:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY, CAPTAIN MELISSA LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KERCH v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERCH v. FORD et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
