Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cooley v. Buford Board of Education et al
as 1:2015cv03009
Plaintiff:
James Rudolph Cooley
Defendant:
Buford Board of Education, The County of Gwinnett Georgia, City of Buford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Administration for Children Services et al
as 1:2014cv03383
Plaintiff:
Chanel Walker
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services, Claudette Hall, Cassandra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inniss et al v. Aderhold et al
as 1:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Christopher Inniss , Shelton Stroman , Rayshawn Chandler and others
Defendant:
Deborah Aderhold, Brook Davidson and Pinkie Toomer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. Catoosa County et al
as 4:2011cv00288
Plaintiff:
Eric Echols
Defendant:
Catoosa County, Tim Deal, Stephen Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Sysco's Food Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Houston
Defendant:
Sysco's Food Service, Inc., Fresh Point Produce (Atlanta), Bob Massave and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mi00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
