Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 19,167
Jackson v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02193
Plaintiff: William R. Jackson
Defendant: WARDEN Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner: Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent: Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxton v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Terry Saxton
Defendant: J. Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimore v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv02159
Petitioner: Roy Latimore
Respondent: Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant: Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff: Kevin H. McKenna
Defendant: Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sifuentes v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Michael David Dyer
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pharr v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02144
Plaintiff: Jeffrey George Pharr
Defendant: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?