Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Baskakov v. ICE
as 1:2023cv02733
Plaintiff:
Grigorii Baskakov
Defendant:
ICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Islas v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
as 1:2022cv04667
Petitioner:
Jose Martin Islas
Respondent:
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diarra v. Department Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Department Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. U.S. Immigration Customs Service (ICE)
as 1:2020cv04746
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration Customs Service (ICE)
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jean Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patel v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 2:2020cv00138
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, John Tsoukaris, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Petitioner:
Rajeshkumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dubon v. Donahue et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Petitioner:
Vidal Garcia Dubon
Respondent:
Damian Streetz, Michael J. Donahue and ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Danglar v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv05512
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Attorney General William Barr, J Suntanto and others
Not Classified By Court:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mounkassa v. DHS/ICE
as 1:2017cv04553
Petitioner:
Adolphe Mounkassa
Respondent:
DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
