Cases 11 - 20 of 6,085
David v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Judge Stacey K. Hydrick, P.D. Scott W. DePlonty, Judge Courtney L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Regan et al
as 1:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Kenny A Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Michael S. Regan and Mr. Osbom Nesbit
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Gowers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Gowers
Defendant:
Jeffrey Johnson, Synergy Investing, LLC, Meredith Shearer & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Police Department and Clayton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. White et al
as 1:2024cv01671
Plaintiff:
Jacob Johnson
Defendant:
Leander White and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
