Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martin et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2018cv04776
Defendant:
Beauty Baldwin, Ralph F. (Rusty) Simpson, Seth Harp and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Clark, Jeanne Dufort, Dana Bowers and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Fazal Khan and Carolyn Bourdeaux for Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bowers et al
as 1:2018cv03859
Defendant:
Tan Bowers and Atlanta Food Truck Park, Limited Liability Company
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bower v. Railworks Track System Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Terry Bower
Defendant:
Railworks Track System Inc. and RailWorks Track Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Estrada et al v. Becker et al
as 1:2016cv03310
Plaintiff:
Elly Marisol Estrada , Salvador Alvarado and Diana Umana
Defendant:
Mark Becker , Steve Michael Dorman , Brooks A. Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers-Hargrove v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00974
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bowers-Hargrove
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights et al v. Alford et al
as 1:2016cv00757
Plaintiff:
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights , Lorena Guillen and Karla Lopez
Defendant:
C. Dean Alford , W. Paul Bowers , Lori Durden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FLSA CASES
as 1:2015mi55555
Plaintiff:
Diane Smith, Cynthia Bailey, Marjorie Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bowers v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03528
Plaintiff:
Katina Marie Bowers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
