Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Abernathy v. Dawson et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Dasha Abernathy
Defendant:
Officer Devon Dawson, Officer White, Officer Derrick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Hohnhorst
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dawson Jack Young
Defendant:
Lynda K. Hohnhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Coleman et al v. Scott
as 1:2022cv03622
Plaintiff:
Roshunda Renee Coleman, Veronica Dawson and Tamiko Delaney
Defendant:
Roger Scott, Turo, Inc., Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv02308
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dawson
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NHT Dawson LLC v. Sykes
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
NHT Dawson LLC doing business as The Cottages at Dawson Ridge
Defendant:
Kierra Sykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hensley v. Taffer et al
as 2:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Paul Hensley
Defendant:
Lt. Taffer, Sgt. Lovingood, Sgt. Hafner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Dawson County
as 2:2021cv00212
Petitioner:
Bobby Germaine Shields
Respondent:
Dawson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
