Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Gill v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00744
Plaintiff: Terry Gill
Defendant: Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 1:2021cv05207
Plaintiff: Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant: Georgia Dept. of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Judy Fritzgerald, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05183
Plaintiff: Harsimrat Gill
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. AGK Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05200
Plaintiff: Manjit Singh Gill and Manjit Singh
Defendant: AGK Enterprises, Inc. and Kuljinder Singh
Gill v. First Continental Bank
as 1:2021mi00105
Plaintiff: Manjit Singh Gill and Manjit Singh
Defendant: First Continental Bank
Gill v. AGK Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021mi00098
Plaintiff: Manjit Singh Gill and Manjit Singh
Defendant: AGK Enterprises, Inc. and Kuljinder Singh
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Parker v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01033
Defendant: Andy Gill, John Does 1-4, Eric Frazier and others
Plaintiff: Shamar Dwight Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gill v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00514
Respondent: Brian Adams and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Petitioner: Ahmad Rashad Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03165
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?