Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 1:2015cv02101
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Gwinnett Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Clark
Defendant:
Gwinnett Police Department, Gwinnett County State Attorney Office and Gwinnett County Jail and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2013cv01000
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Theodore Jackson, Fulton County Pretrial Service, Overton Thierry and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boyd v. Carter
as 1:2012cv02537
Plaintiff:
Thasha A. Boyd
Defendant:
Brandt Carter
Movant:
United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Traylor v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2012cv01286
Petitioner:
Lawrence Traylor
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Georgia State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. GA Dept. of Law et al
as 1:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Barber
Defendant:
GA Dept. of Law, State Attorney General of Georgia, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
