Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Mieles et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05545
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mieles , Kansandra Mieles and Kevin Flores
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Deandre Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
Larry Flores
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Flores et al
as 1:2017cv02829
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Defendant:
Epifano Flores, Maria Isabel Ponce and United States of America
Flores v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv01162
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
David Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flores v. Creative Stone, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04669
Plaintiff:
Videl Vicario Flores
Defendant:
Creative Stone, Inc. and Dimitri S. Kellner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mosby v. Batchelor et al
as 1:2015cv04422
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Mosby
Defendant:
Ronnie K. Batchelor, Marlene Zekser, Richard T. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2015cv03669
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cedano-Flores v. Knight Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04137
Plaintiff:
Luis Cedano-Flores
Defendant:
Knight Transportation, Inc. and Barbara Ann Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
