Cases 31 - 40 of 296
Spivey v. Moats et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Israel James Spivey
Defendant:
Johnny Moats and Hal Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillom v. Floyd C. Sherriffs Dept
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kathleen D. Gillom
Defendant:
Floyd Co. Sherriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huston v. Floyd County Jail
as 4:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Huston
Defendant:
Floyd County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Watkins et al
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd
Defendant:
Tammy Watkins, Kentavious Ellis, Mr. Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Floyd Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Floyd Sheriff Office, Tim Burkhalter, Major Pledger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jutawin v. Floyd County Superior Court et al
as 1:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nagipe Jutawin and Julia Catherine Stanley
Defendant:
Floyd County Superior Court and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nagipejutawin v. Floyd County School
as 4:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Nagipejutawin and Julia Stanley
Defendant:
Floyd County School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Kent Tyrik Robinson
Defendant:
Cobb County, Sheriff Craig Owens, Colonel Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04412
Plaintiff:
Omar Holder
Defendant:
Randy Akies, Melody M. Maddox, Officer Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilgrim v. Moates et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Pilgrim
Defendant:
Sheriff Johnny Moates and Chairman Hal Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
