Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Diaz v. DeKalb County Jail
as 1:2017cv05046
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz et al v. C. D. or E. F. et al
as 1:2017cv04824
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz, Helen Brandy Miranda, Arlen Miranda Lopez and others
Defendant:
C. D. or E. F. and E. F. or C. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miranda et al v. Secretary of the U.S. State Department et al
as 1:2017cv04665
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Plutarco Miranda, Roberta Lopez Nepomuseno, Arlen Miranda Lopez and others
Defendant:
Secretary of the U.S. State Department, The Chief, Waiver Review Division, The Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDowell et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03502
Plaintiff:
Andrew McDowell , Jennifer Parker , Morgan McClung and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Diaz v. Bickham et al
as 1:2017cv02165
Petitioner:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz
Respondent:
Phil Bickham, John Kelly and Jeff B. Session, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01512
Petitioner:
Leopoldo Plutarco Miranda Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gunn et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04148
Plaintiff:
William Gunn and Miranda Gunn
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Georgia Diagnostic Classification Prison
as 1:2016cv02018
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Miranda Diaz
Defendant:
Georgia Diagnostic Classification Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Conway et al
as 1:2016cv01871
Plaintiff:
Wanda Denise Miranda
Defendant:
Butch Conway and Gwinnett County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
