Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shaw v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01922
Plaintiff:
Gypsy Rosanna Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Dorsett Industries, Inc., Tandus Centiva, Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Johnson
Special Master:
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Petitioner:
The Carpet and Rug Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shaw v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv04368
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daker v. Daker et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
A.A. Butch Ayers, Jordan Cyphers, Charles M. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw Industries, Inc. v. Landsar Ranger, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shaw Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
