Cases 41 - 50 of 2,679
Mngadi v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Zama Mngadi
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Recinos v. Baulding et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brad Recinos
Defendant:
Sharikka Baulding, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
Angela Brady Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hall v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Angela Hall
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wilson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0925 A Wrongful Denial of a Firearm
Warner v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00671
Petitioner:
Mauricio Warner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morrell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Georgia and Fulton County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diamond
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Peak v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Cassius Standifer Peak
Defendant:
United States of America
Petlechkov v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
