Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Mathis v. Barrow et al
as 1:2013cv00296
Petitioner:
Antonio Mathis
Respondent:
Donald Barrow and Samuel S. Olens
Mathis v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv03343
Plaintiff:
Jamall D. Mathis
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
Robert Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donley et al v. City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA et al
as 1:2012cv03207
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Donley and Tony E. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA , Essie West , Jeff Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv02441
Plaintiff:
Robert Mathis
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Paul L. Howard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. GA Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02284
Plaintiff:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Defendant:
GA Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Goldstein & Hayes, PC
as 1:2012cv01706
Plaintiff:
Jannie M. Mathis
Defendant:
Goldstein & Hayes, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis v. Keller
as 1:2012cv01293
Petitioner:
Erik Michael Mathis
Defendant:
J. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mathis v. Lawson et al
as 1:2012cv01270
Plaintiff:
Jamall Mathis
Defendant:
Lawson, Tyasia Jones, Mike Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Georgia v. Mathis
as 3:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Kevin Mashay Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
