Cases 61 - 70 of 1,429
Rossetti v. City of South Fulton, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04474
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Rossetti
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Georgia, Officer R. McCain, Officer A. Jackson and others
Neese v. Simmons et al
as 1:2023cv04441
Plaintiff:
Monroe J. Neese
Defendant:
David A. Simmons, ADM Trucking Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Company and others
Petitioner:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Floco Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04291
Plaintiff:
Dexter Daniels
Defendant:
Floco Foods, Inc., Floco Foods, LLC, W. Lee Flowers & Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
The Love Family Trust, LLC et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2023cv04252
Plaintiff:
The Love Family Trust, LLC and Daniel David Delpiano
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
