Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Harmon et al v. Fulton County, Georgia
as 1:2015cv02959
Plaintiff:
Gary Dennis Harmon , Daviyette Shanet Addison , Kennedy Copeland and others
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Mitchell v. Presbyterian Homes of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02718
Plaintiff:
Cherlyn Mitchell
Defendant:
Presbyterian Homes of Georgia, Inc., Thom Rochenbach, Frank H. McElroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Sinclair et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Randolph Sinclair and Carol Sinclair
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03240
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Randolph
Defendant:
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bacon et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2014cv02209
Plaintiff:
Waine Bacon , Jimmie Browner , Jeffrey Chase and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. United State of America
as 4:2014cv00153
Petitioner:
Robert Randolph
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randolph v. Hall County Detention Center
as 2:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brian Randolph
Defendant:
Hall County Detention Center and Hall County Detention Center Medical Staff and Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Randolph et al
as 1:2013cv01965
Plaintiff:
Tracy Mason
Defendant:
T. Randolph, D. Williams and P. Masselli
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Warren v. Fulton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv04299
Plaintiff:
Valencia Warren
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Department, Randolph Scott, W. Angry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
