Cases 61 - 70 of 119
DCI Transport LLC et al v. Gibraltar Logistics Group LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
DCI Transport LLC and Global Holdings Group Inc.
Defendant:
Gibraltar Logistics Group LLC , Jeremy March , Jasmine Torres and others
Counter_claimant:
Jacqueline Perry , Fawn Bowen , Jeremy March and others
Counter_defendant:
DCI Transport LLC and Global Holdings Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rushin v. Bowens et al
as 1:2014cv04065
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rushin
Defendant:
Bowens and Case Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Douglas County, State of Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv03898
Plaintiff:
Bundy Cobb
Defendant:
Douglas County, State of Georgia , Douglas County Board of Elections and Registration , Sylvanus L. Burney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Naval Recruit District Atlanta
as 1:2014cv03678
Plaintiff:
Alton L. Bowen
Defendant:
Naval Recruit District Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bowen v. SunTrust Broker's
as 1:2014cv03679
Plaintiff:
Alton L. Bowen
Defendant:
SunTrust Broker's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv03653
Plaintiff:
Alton L. Bowen
Defendant:
Eric Jones and Bartholomew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Maurice Chandler Orr, Jr.
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Janice Magnum, Jim Askey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Magnum et al
as 2:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Maurice Chandler Orr, Jr.
Defendant:
Janice Magnum, Jim Askey, Mandy Tolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02955
Plaintiff:
Janette Bowen
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Colfin AI GA 1, LLC
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
