Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Chandler v. Widner et al
as 2:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
John Alan Chandler
Defendant:
Jimmie D. Widner , James R. Smith Trucking, Co., Inc. and National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Chandler et al
as 1:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Wright
Defendant:
Clifford Chandler and East Point Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Robert L. Chandler et al v. Wells Fargo N.A.
as 1:2012cv01007
Plaintiff:
Estate of Robert L. Chandler and Ceola P. Chandler
Defendant:
Wells Fargo N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chandler v. Sunderman et al
as 1:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Lisa M. Sunderman and Lynn Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patilla v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Francine Patilla
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Curtis et al
as 1:2011cv04543
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey V. Curtis, Karen J. Curtis, Elizabeth Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Echols v. Catoosa County et al
as 4:2011cv00288
Plaintiff:
Eric Echols
Defendant:
Catoosa County, Tim Deal, Stephen Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manomano v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Plaintiff:
Ralph Manomano
Defendant:
Ashley Bell, Steve Chronic, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcombe et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02955
Plaintiff:
Mayme Holcombe and Jock Chandler
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Council v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02600
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Council
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registrations, Incorporated, et al. (MERS) , Washington Mutual Bank/JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
