Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Hardy et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Hardy , Michael Anthoney Bales , Justine David Ricks and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Sally Quillian Yates
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Boyd v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv04132
Plaintiff:
Thasha A. Boyd
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014mi00082
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Colvard v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2013cv01075
Plaintiff:
Murray M. Colvard
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Wilson v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00800
Petitioner:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Respondent:
Ralph Cherry, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Parole Commissioner and others
Smith v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuals, Jr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Department and Inhoused Entity of United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bricker v. Cobb County Government & Personnel et al
as 1:2011cv04066
Plaintiff:
Jory J. Bricker
Defendant:
Cobb County Government & Personnel, Georgia State Government & Personnel, P. Harris Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
